1. a. Facebook is a multibillion-dollar venture capitalist project, growing in obsessive popularity for users and abusers, while disconnecting us from human and environmental connection.
b. I agree with Hodgkinson’s connection between facebook and paypal, and his general view of few individuals economically gaining from the obstruction of the masses’ privacy and social dependency.
I also agree that the safest option is to remain unplugged, whether or not that will get you farther than the next facebook fanatic.
I disagree with Hodgkinson’s completely biased point of view, although he made a lot of valid points, the whole article was highly opinionated and unpersuasive to those who feel differently.
I also disagree with his completely negative feelings on facebook and seemingly cluelessness to why anyone would want to use it. I think he failed to mention its obvious advantages, and was a little predictable when discussing his alternative activities that were highly productive and offline.
2. Williams provided a well descript outline of the different tactics that advertisements use, and listed well-rounded solutions and consumer tactics that promoted smart consumerism. I think that going to Toys R Us will be a mind numbing experience, and we will be able to pick out all of the different persuasions that Williams discusses and more. Child advertising is most problematic in my perspective, because of the brainpower and psychological inadequacies that children have compared to the “persuaders” of big toy companies that are paid millions/ billions. Otherwise, I didn’t really learn anything new, but it was a more positive and constructively minded article than some of the other ones.
3.
1. I observed a lot of bias, and boldly overstated and dramatized opinions based on ads that were on the extreme side of a large spectrum and were set up for failure with her critical narration. Although I thoroughly enjoyed it and agree with the majority of her perspectives.
2. The film made me feel upset about my femininity, and for other females of the past, present and future. I think that these objectifying stereotypes will always be carried within our gender, but there’s a lot to say about how male stereotypes are portrayed in the media as well, which is another important point she didn’t focus on.
3. Kilbourne’s highlighted tactic of persuasion was humor, along with symbols, hyperbole, rhetorical questions, straw man, fear/ defensive nationalism, testimonial, repitition, either/ or, strength, scientific evidence, maybe and timing. Not to compare her to the very subject she is resisting, I just thought it was interesting since everyone is trying to get one point or another crossed, using the same tactics. Therefore, the consumer is the one who is either well or misinformed and chooses their standpoint accordingly.
4. One of the more seriously damaging effects of media that Kilbourned discusses is on female adolescence, because there are so many cases of sexual abuse and younger girls being subjected to their bodies’ development before their sexuality can catch up to them. So it’s definitely been found to be problematic for a huge percentage of that age group.
5. Going off #4, Kilbourne makes an excellent point that sexual images and the idea of sex=selling=sex is everywhere. There was one ad that she shows a clip of I think it was selling lei jeans, and I actually remember watching it as a kid in the late 90’s or so, and looking at it now, I feel it is completely inappropriate and has nothing to do with the product. I remember it airing fairly regularly, and I must’ve been watching some stupid kids show, yet there was this couple for a loonnggg commercial of kinky foreplay in nothing but jeans, and wet paint being rubbed all over his cut muscles and her slim curves. Yikes!
